Talking “at” Not “to” Everyone: A Note on Twitter and Hashtag Use

June 23, 2009

Everyone knows that Twitter is all about the conversation, right? It’s about connecting with people, developing relationships and sharing information in 140 characters.

Some communicators are better at balancing the three than others, but this post is for the PR and Marketing folk who use this platform to share valuable information. Here’s my first question for you (”experts” can jump to question two):

Do you know what hashtags are?

hashtag cartoonHashtags.org defines them as “ a community-driven convention for adding additional context and metadata to your tweets. They’re like tags on Flickr, only added inline to [your message].”

There aren’t any major rules when it comes to using hashtags. Simply throw in the “#” before the message and tweet away.

One of the most popular ways to use hashtags is to use the agreed upon hashtag when live tweeting from conferences. Here’s an example of that in action from BlogPotomac 2009:

jaywalk1: @loryn24 Some would say YOU don’t determine your brand. The ppl you know and interact with do. I’m not buying that 100%. #blogpotomac

The hashtag doesn’t need to go at the end of the message, but it often does, and as you can see, by using hashtags, you are able to track tweets posted by anyone using that same tag.
People create all kinds of tags and participate in themed discussions such as #followfriday and #charitytuesday. One extremely popular and useful tag at the moment is #iranelection. This brings me to my second question:
Are you using hashtags appropriately?
I know, I know. I just finished talking about how there were not any rules to this. I’m still sticking with that, and if you have been on twitter long enough, I’m sure you have a friend or two who get a little “hashtag happy” and create their own tags for everything. I’m not here to regulate, but I’d like to point out the fact that there are established communities forming around these tags…some you know about and some you don’t.
It was at BlogPotomac during a talk from Shireen Mitchell (@digitalsista) that I really began to give this some thought. Being in the District, I follow a healthy amount of people truly engaged in political discussion on twitter, and I thought I was decently clued in to the popular tags people used- #tcot (top conservatives on twitter) and #tlot (top liberals on twitter).
twitter-hashtag-logoAs someone who tends to throw in my own tags from time to time, I was foolish to think that these were the main ones. In her discussion, she listed a host of others that I had never even heard of and said something that really drove a message home. I use these tags to speak to groups, but I speak to everyone.
Through her use of these hashtags (and there are SEVERAL!), she is able to speak to and share information directly with groups all across the spectrum. She doesn’t simply put the message out there.
You may be thinking, well I do the same thing right now. But do you really?
Many of us simply tweet and put the information out there. There is a beauty to the way twitter works, the serendipity that can occur with the right person just happening to come across the information you shared, but how much stronger could our message be?
How much longer could the trail of the pass along or re-tweets be if really took more time to check out the communities of people we are trying to reach to determine the tags they use, the communities they interact with, the communities they would benefit from being connected to?
My final thought: you could talk “at” everyone  and dangle the fishing line, but you’ll do much better in connecting with the right people if you spend some time looking into the communities building around these hashtag conversations and speak to them directly.

Going to BlogPotomac?

June 11, 2009

bpotomac

Going to BlogPotomac? If so, let me know. Leave a comment here, email me at james.walker@prprescriptions.com, @ me or DM me. I won’t make the happy hr tonight, but it would be great to meetup with you during one of the breaks tomorrow.

I know it seems like I’m writing a personal letter to the world, but just throwing out the line… See yall tomorrow!


Entrepreneurs: It’s time to get a PR Firm when…

June 8, 2009

Entrepreneur magazine’s June 2009 issue featured a short piece titled “Get Thee to a PR firm.” In the article, 5 Entrepreneurs shared thoughts on when they knew it was time to hire a PR firm. Stories varied, but here’s when it clicked for them:

  • People started talking.
  • The specialty niche became a trend.
  • The entrepreneur dreamed of going national.
  • Sales came to a halt.
  • It just became too much.

So, is there a specific point in the business growth process when you should hire a PR firm?

No, I think that’s clear from the range of responses provided from this small sample of entrepreneurs. Each business and circumstance will be a little different, and you will be looking to communicate a variety of different things from updates on the business to awards to new focus/products/services/offerings and the list goes on.

There IS, however, a specific point when you should engage a PR professional.

When? Five minutes after you begin to think about engaging with the public.

Why five minutes? It’s enough time to figure out if you’re ready to take that step (budget), but not so much time that you begin to brainstorm and become wedded to your own ideas. That’s why WE are here!

I was being a bit cheeky there, but in all seriousness, it may take days, months or years before you truly need a firm to assist you, but  you should be engaging a PR consultant from the very beginning to discuss your strategy.

How can a PR consultant help? There are millions of ways, but here are a few keys areas:

  • Providing an outside perspective on messaging - How are you describing your business and the service it provides? Is it as effective as you think it is?
  • Defining and Targeting audiences – Most of the entrepreneurs whom I’ve had the pleasure of meeting generally have a great sense of who they would like to target. However, knowing who your audience is does not directly translate into knowing the best ways to communicate with that audience.
  • Strategy and Solutions - PR pros rarely get the credit we’re due for strategic thinking. We are, at our core, strategic thinkers who come up with solutions. Note that I didn’t limit this to communications solutions. The truth is, depending on the pro, we do a great deal more than that. Our work and experience can blend in other functions (marketing, advertising, fundraising, etc) and several sectors (health care/ health policy, technology, corporate responsibility, etc).
  • Getting Funding - This one comes straight from Entrepreneur. According to a survey they conducted, “Companies engaging in PR campaigns were 30 percent more successful in attaining funding within 1 to 3 months than companies without a campaign.”

It may be wise to hold off on hiring a firm for long-term work, but a working relationship with a solid PR consultant is definitely an extremely valuable thing to have in your arsenal as you set out to grow your business or organization.


Great Minds Irk Alike

June 2, 2009

I may not have many things in common with Alltop founder and walking success story Guy Kawasaki, but it turns out that we share a common distaste for a few things that people do online.

frustrated

His June 2009 Entrepreneur magazine piece titled “Website Marketing Turnoffs” lays out 13 “silly and even stupid ways some companies are hindering adoption of their products and services.” One place where I’ll deviate from Guy’s thinking is his application of these things to companies. To me, this applies to everyone  online, companies and definitely anyone blogging. As I read the list, I couldn’t help but think: “Yes! Right! Seriously! EXACTLY!!”

A few that made me mad just visualizing the offenders in action include:

#1 Forcing immediate registration: Requiring a new user to register is a reasonable request—after you’ve sucked him in. The sites that require registration as the first step are putting a barrier in front of adoption.

I hate this. As a PR guy, I know the value of capturing the email, but as an online PR guy, I also know how fast a visitor can click off a site if something jumps between them and the content they seek. Something to think about…

#3 Windows that don’t generate URLs: Have you ever wanted to point people to a page, but the page has no URL? Did the company decide it didn’t want referrals, links and additional traffic?

Yes, yes…oh and yes! And bloggers, please do both me and yourself a favor, make it easy for me to point to specific posts. There is nothing like trying to send a post to someone only to find that my sole option is sending the main URL with a date and title.

#6 Limiting contact to e-mail: Don’t get me wrong; I live and die by e-mail. But sometimes I want to call or even snail-mail a company. Many companies only let you send an e-mail via their “Contact Us” page. Why can’t companies be honest and just call it “Don’t Contact Us”?

I agree with Guy, but I’m going to take this one in a slightly different direction. When I’m reading up on bloggers, there are times when I’d like to share info or ask a question that is not suited for everyone’s eyes. I have little faith in contact forms (that they work and that they get read), so please people include an email address. Gmail is FREE! Open a new account just for people like me and maintain your privacy with your personal account. You don’t have to check it every five minutes…every ten will do.

Those are just a few that jumped out at me. You can read the full list here.

*Flickr Photo Credit – PaloAlto




Facebook Causes: The Jury has a Verdict

April 23, 2009

app_3_2318966938_2893When I first read the Washington Post piece titled “To Nonprofits Seeking Cash, Facebook App Isn’t So Green, Though Popular, ‘Causes’ Ineffective for Fundraising,” I got pretty fired up and was ready to blast off a post, but I thought it would be more interesting to hear from you. I polled several online networks (the blog, twitter and linked in), and here’s what you had to say: 

“Facebook Causes are great for raising visibility and finding people passionate about your cause/org. It’s also free, so why wouldn’t you?

Also, a lot of organizations have had success using the cause to fundraise with specific drives. You can’t expect ANY fundraising initiative to work without a call to action and sense of urgency. People who think you can just create a cause and have cash come rolling in are seriously misguided. That’s my two cents.”

-Emily Carone


“They’re a tactic, not a strategy. Causes work when they are being used in concert with a concrete ask or goal. It’s a vehicle for building support but must have relevance to something bigger.”

-Adam Rosenberg


“It certainly is effective – it just depends on how you’re looking at it -
The Causes application isn’t offering you a magical portal to an untapped fundraising goldmine…and neither is any other online or social media application.”

-Lateef

 

“All the social networking platforms including Facebook are part of a new social revolution that is initiated from the Internet. This revolution is still in its initial stages, and it is likely to move towards a concept of “instant democracy” where the expressions, choices, and associated impacts are expected to be “instantaneous” and far reaching.

In this context, these platforms and its users are going through an initial exploratory and evolving period, followed by a somewhat “disenchantment” for a while, followed by gradual maturity, leverage, and proliferation.

Looking from bigger perspective, none of these are going to be waste, but from a local perspective of an individual and associated priorities, it can be total waste of time.

- Nataraja (Nats) Upadhya

 

I use it for a global-type awareness. It is easy to reach my constituency and then it takes old fashioned asking and methods to receive the funds. For example it is easier to tell your friend about the cause and have them pay through Facebook Cause or paypal.”

- Orletta Caldwell

 

“Some how we (non-profit and for profit organizations) have all been sold on the idea of passive income from the Internet. The internet doesn’t mean less work, It means more efficient work. NO FREE LUNCH!”

- Napoleon C. Birch

“Waste. Everyone adopts the cause because it’s as easy as clicking the mouse, yet I haven’t seen any case studies or analyses illustrating that Facebook Cause pages actually produce action or contributions.

If my client wants a Facebook page, we’ll set it up, but we’ll also manage expectations and point them to other, more effective means of promoting the cause.”

- Kevin Mercuri

 

So what do I think? I agree with most of you who say that Causes is not a waste. Causes, ESPECIALLY when you’re talking about fundraising, is a tool. When I look at Causes, I am personally more interested in how you can use it and other tools, like the Facebook petition, to raise awareness, rally people around an issue and share information about actions people can take to address the issue. That’s just me.

On the fundraising note, this is a little bit more complicated than “If you build it, they will come.” If you build it, they MAY come, and there’s a CHANCE that they will give, but you have to develop  a relationship (between you and them or a least a link between them and the cause) and make the ask. It’s a lot of work, but it’s possible if there’s someone working with you who understands three things: 

  • Fundraising 
  • Relationships
  • How to use social media to connect the two. 

In the case of Facebook Causes vs. Washington Post, we the jury find the defendant, Facebook Causes, effective…for those with realistic expectations and an online strategy tailor-made for their organization and supporters. 



Recap- Social Media Club DC: Health 2.0

February 22, 2009

February is quickly nearing its end, but I couldn’t let the month close without doing a quick recap on the last Social Media Club DC event.

268298488On February 11th, Alex Rampy and the folks at IQ Solutions hosted the group and led a discussion titled “Engaging the Health World through Social Media”. Alex served as the moderator for the night and there was a great group of guests on the panel:

Dr. Val Jones, Physician & Blog Entrepreneur, Staying UPstream of MAINstream Media.
(http://getbetterhealth.com/)

Christian Olsen, Online healthcare specialist. Connecting companies with communities. (http://www.apcoworldwide.com)

Mark Scrimshire, Change Agent, Blogger and Visionary. Organizer of HealthCamp. (http://ekive.blogspot.com/ or http://barcamp.org/HealthCamp)

Joel Selzer, Entrepreneur and Innovator in Health Care and Social Media.
(http://www.ozmosis.com)

It’s always great to go to these events when there is an active conversation going on between the panelists and the attendees. The group tossed thoughts around on a number of topics including the definition of Health 2.0, adverse events reporting, the current state of doctor/patient relationships, communities of color and the lack of trust and thoughts on potential social media adoption by medical professionals.

At one point in the conversation, an attendee offered online literacy training as a solution to problems we are currently seeing with patients getting inaccurate health care information online. In her mind, the problem was caused by people not knowing the difference between blogs and credible health information sites. Not exactly accepting her point of view, I had to chime in. I think the issues we see today in this area are directly tied to two areas:

1. A breakdown in the doctor/patient relationship

2. A lack of “social-media literate” medical professionals

The latter is being taken care of (to an extent) as Gen Y-ers begin to enter the medical field, but they still need to come up with strategies for ways to include social media in their practice. Depending on the health condition under discussion, I think health professionals should try to work with patients to help them sift through what they find online and help provide them with appropriate online resources. (Might need to run that by my friend at GW Med – might just be seen as extra work)

If you’re interested in the world of Health 2.0 and what is to come, you definitely need to check out HealthCampDC coming up on February 27, 2009.


6 Ways to Play Twitter

February 21, 2009

This little gem came my way via Hard Knox Life, but all credit must go to Aki Spicer at Fallon Planning. Too great not to share. Looking at these categories immediately makes me think of Dan Schawbel though. We all have a personal brand that we build, and a large part of that involves our communication with others. Looking at the image below, I think I fit into several categories. How about you? 

6ways2playtwitter


Wanna Test Drive My Job?

February 13, 2009

Nope. Sorry. This is not my offer for you to be me for the day. Hope the title wasn’t misleading!

Seriously though, Test Drive My Job is the name of a series done by Blogger/Journalist/PR pro Amanda Miller Littlejohn (@amandamogul).

Check me and some of her other profiles out on her blog Mopwater PR + Media Notes.